Continuity Protocol Changelog
Append-only. Every change to the protocol is recorded here, oldest first. Entries are never edited or removed.
Entry 0 — Aarambam · Founding
Action: Protocol drafted and published as reference architecture.
What was set:
- Eight protected laws (System Law Lock).
- Six continuity levels (0 — Normal through 5 — Permanent Continuity Mode).
- Seven Continuity Council roles, all sealed (no holders).
- Founder Legacy File defined as sealed-and-offline; opening requires four approvals.
- Takeover risks and controls documented.
- Public Distance Modes (Visible / Architect / Silent Steward / Continuity).
- System Survival Checklist across Legal, Technical, Finance, Governance, Public, Sensitive.
- Per-system continuity rules for Domains, Technical, Treasury, Starter Card, VinMin, MOZI, Aayvu, Thayagam, Velicham.
- Public Continuity Statement published at
/continuity. - Empty
continuity_eventstable created — no events recorded.
What was deliberately not built:
- No live inactivity timer.
- No notification engine.
- No council-approval UI.
- No real Legacy File contents on the site.
Reviewer: Founder. Status: Active reference. No live activation.
Entry 1 — Aarambam · Licensing Firewall added
Action: Clause 9 (Licensing Firewall) added to the Continuity Protocol. Published on /continuity-guard and referenced from the Becoming-layer papers /critical-research/parliamentary-pathway and /critical-research/distributed-spine.
What was set:
- TLTE C.I.C. may license Governance OS, Velicham, Aayvu, evidence registry, citation system, and continuity infrastructure to any lawful political vehicle that adopts the Seven Sacred Rules and the two-layer rule.
- TLTE does not own, control, fund, or direct any licensed vehicle.
- Each licensed vehicle registers under its own jurisdiction's law and is governed independently.
- No licensee may advocate or glorify political violence.
- Inclusion of Hill-Country Tamils, East Coast Muslims, and Sinhalese democrats is mandatory on any licensed platform.
- Any licence may be reviewed and revoked in writing by the Continuity Council, with public reasons.
What was deliberately not built:
- No licensee exists.
- No licence has been issued.
- No political party is registered, sponsored, owned, or funded by TLTE.
Reviewer: Founder. Status: Active reference. No live activation.
Entry 2 — Aarambam · Move #3 (EU GSP+ Compliance Desk) anchored
Action: The Recorded Legal Memory work (Move #4) and the EU GSP+ Compliance work (Move #3) are added to the protected-instruments list governed by the Continuity Protocol. Their multi-community rules become protocol-grade — they cannot be silently removed by any future steward.
What was set:
- The EU GSP+ Compliance Desk and MP Pack #6 are protected civic instruments.
- Hard rule fixed in protocol: TLTE never asks the UK, EU, or any MP/MEP to call for GSP+ withdrawal. This may not be reversed without a public Continuity Council resolution.
- Hard rule fixed in protocol: every Tamil-specific labour citation on the GSP+ surface must be paired with at least one Eastern Muslim and one up-country labour citation.
- MEP fork (MP Pack #6.5) authorised — same instrument adapted for the European Parliament cycle leading to 1 January 2027.
What was deliberately not built:
- No direct intake from Sri Lankan apparel workers, estate workers, or Eastern Province workers — TLTE routes to ILO / OHCHR / credentialed unions only.
- No "Tamil GDP" or aggregated trade-loss figures.
Reviewer: Founder. Status: Active reference. Public.
Entry 3 — Aarambam · Move #4 (Recorded Legal Memory Desk) anchored
Action: The Recorded Legal Memory Desk (/unmai/desk/legal-memory), the 5-custodian Archive Map, and MP Pack #7 (tamil-legal-memory) are added to the protected-instruments list. The Soulbury (1945) and Donoughmore (1928) commission reports are added to the citations registry to close the 1806 → 1947 continuity chain.
What was set:
- The 1706 → 1806 → 1947 → present-day continuity is fixed as the legitimacy spine of the desk.
- Hard rule fixed in protocol: the Dutch and British colonial administrations are described as record-keepers, never as authorities — Tamil Mudaliars are the legal authors. May not be silently reversed.
- Hard rule fixed in protocol: TLTE defers all reform of Thesawalamai content to Magalir Avai. The diaspora and this desk recover the fact of codification only.
- Hard rule fixed in protocol: TLTE never asks the UK, the Netherlands, or any MP/MEP to recognise Tamil statehood or to support restoration of Thesawalamai content.
- MEP fork of MP Pack #7 reserved (
mp-pack-tamil-legal-memory-mepdossier slug registered for future fork).
What was deliberately not built:
- No Tamil-customary-law revival project. The desk recovers the record; reform is for the homeland and for Magalir Avai.
- No claim that Tamil land or sovereignty was "granted" by any colonial power. The wording is "recorded".
Reviewer: Founder. Status: Active reference. Public.
Entry 4 — Aarambam · Phase P3: Second Witness · Stewardship Register stub · first Recall dry-run
Action: Three procedural anchors are added on the same era-stamped revision. They take the Continuity Protocol from "written" to "exercised once on the public record".
What was set:
- A second Witness is recognised on this entry. Entries 0 → 3 carried a single reviewer (the Founder). From Entry 4 onward every protocol revision is co-witnessed: Witness A (Founder) and Witness B (a Continuity Witness, recorded by sealed identifier until the era-2 rotation opens that seat for confirmation). The two-witness rule is now binding for all future entries — no single hand may edit the protocol.
- The public Stewardship Register stub is published at
/stewardship-register. It declares, with honesty, that during the founding era most seats are sealed and report "0 confirmed holders". The Register's schema — what it commits to publish at each cycle — is fixed now so no future steward can quietly narrow it. - The first Recall procedure dry-run is published at
/recall-dry-run. The recall mechanism described in/accountable-stewardshipis exercised, end-to-end, against a hypothetical Charter violation. No real person is named. The dry-run proves the procedure is operable; it does not open a real recall.
What was deliberately not built:
- The second Witness identity is not disclosed by name. Personal-safety convention applies until the Stewardship Register opens the seat for public confirmation.
- The Stewardship Register does not list real human beings during Aarambam beyond the Founder. Sealed seats are shown as sealed.
- The Recall dry-run is not a real proceeding. No respondent, no complainant, no jurisdictional claim.
Reviewer A (Founder): witnessed.
Reviewer B (Continuity Witness, sealed identifier cw-02-aarambam): witnessed.
Status: Active reference. Public.
