TLTE — Transformative League of Tamil Eelam logo
VinMin · வின்மின்·A digital homeland
Structural Mathematics
Model 05 · descriptive · falsifiable

சுருங்கல் செயல்பாடுNarrowing Function N(t)

Count of viable non-secessionist constitutional pathways attempted and not yet closed at time t.

Formula
N(t) = | { viable constitutional pathways attempted and not yet closed at time t } |

§1What it measures

NF is the culmination model. It does not measure feeling; it counts pathways. A pathway is on the list only if it (a) was formally attempted, (b) was non-secessionist in form, and (c) is still open in the sense defined below.

The Narrowing Timeline (§ 02 on /case/narrowing) is the source list. N(t) is the operationalisation of that timeline into a single integer at each point in time.

§2Inputs & sources

Pathway types

(a) Negotiated pact: Bandaranaike-Chelvanayakam (1957), Dudley-Chelvanayakam (1965). (b) Devolution package: 13th Amendment (1987), Chandrika Constitutional Reform Package (1995), Draft Constitution (2000). (c) Internationally-backed mechanism: Cease-Fire Agreement (2002), UNHRC Resolution 30/1 (2015). (d) Domestic accountability mechanism: LLRC (2011), OMP (2017), Office for Reparations (2018).

  • /case/narrowing — 22-step timeline (source list for all pathway entries)
  • Tier-A primary sources cited within each step
'Closed' — the operational rule

A pathway is closed at time t if any of: (i) formally abrogated by its sponsoring government; (ii) formally withdrawn (e.g. 2020 co-sponsorship withdrawal from 30/1); (iii) substantively unimplemented for more than ten years with no published implementation roadmap and no measurable timeline.

  • Same as pathway types — closure is documented within the cited record of each pathway.

§3Worked reading

N(2026) under this counting rule is 0. Every pathway in the list above is either formally abrogated, formally withdrawn, or substantively unimplemented past the ten-year rule with no published roadmap.

N(t) = 0 is a finding about the established constitutional repertoire, not a finding about every conceivable remedy. New pathways can be added to the list at any time — the model is open, not closed.

Falsifier

If any closed pathway is reopened with a published implementation roadmap and a measurable timeline, N(t) increments and the model is correspondingly revised. If two or more are reopened, the structural-narrowing branch of the case is materially weakened.

Non-claim: N(t) = 0 does not entail that secession is the remedy. International law does not work that way; nor does TLTE. N(t) = 0 entails only that the established repertoire of non-secessionist constitutional remedies has been exhausted on the empirical record, which is the predicate the remedial-self-determination doctrine looks for under the Quebec / Kosovo / Aaland line of reasoning.

What this model is not

NF does not name any negotiator, sponsor, or signatory.
NF is not a recommendation of any pathway. It is a count of attempted-and-closed ones.
NF is not a forecast that no new pathway will emerge. The list is open and incrementable.
Cited within TLTE by
Cite this model: tlte-cite:case-math-nf · Aarambam · descriptive only
Continue in The Self-Determination Case