TLTE — Transformative League of Tamil Eelam logo
VinMin · வின்மின்·A digital homeland
Framing & Doctrine
Scholar Ledger

ஆய்வாளர் பதிவேடுWho is read for what, and what each refuses to assert

A matrix of the scholars cited across the case file. For each scholar: the question they answer best, what they refuse to assert, and the page on this site that uses them. Tamil scholarship — Guruparan, Ananthavinayagan, Sterio, Fernando, UTHR(J) — is foregrounded. The ledger exists so a reader can see, at one glance, the doctrinal weight behind any claim on this site.

Tamil scholarship — foregrounded

Kumaravadivel Guruparan

tlte-cite:guruparan-ucl-2019
Answers
What minimum constitutional restructuring would meet the Aaland / Quebec safeguard-clause standard for Sri Lanka.
Refuses
To argue for remedial secession as established law; he frames the question constitutionally.
Used on
/case/framing/remedial-self-determination · /case/civic-repair

Thamil Venthan Ananthavinayagan

tlte-cite:ananthavinayagan-phrg-2018
Answers
How the post-2009 constitutional record reads against the Quebec §134 internal-self-determination threshold.
Refuses
To assert the §135 internal-blockage condition is satisfied; he leaves the conclusion hedged.
Used on
/case/framing/remedial-self-determination · /case/law
Answers
How the great-powers configuration shapes which self-determination claims are recognised.
Refuses
To treat doctrine as sufficient for recognition; her thesis is realist constraint, not legitimation.
Used on
/case/framing/remedial-self-determination · /case/stabiliser

Jude Lal Fernando

tlte-cite:fernando-snu-sd
Answers
The political-theological register of the self-determination question that doctrinal accounts elide.
Refuses
To collapse the moral register into the legal register.
Used on
/case/framing/remedial-self-determination

UTHR(J) — University Teachers for Human Rights (Jaffna)

tlte-cite:uthr-j
Answers
The intra-Tamil critique of LTTE-era political killings, suppression of dissent, recruitment practices.
Refuses
To exempt the LTTE from human-rights critique on grounds of the wider cause.
Used on
/case/framing/contested-sovereignty · /case/ltte-era/human-ledger · /unmai/desk/attribution
International-law scholarship
Answers
The five-element doctrinal test for remedial secession (Self-Determination of Peoples, OUP 1995); and as STL President, the customary-definition-of-terrorism holding (STL-11-01/I, 2011).
Refuses
To assert his five-element test as lex lata; he marks it as doctrinal proposal.
Used on
/case/framing/remedial-self-determination · /case/framing/defining-terrorism

James Crawford

Answers
The classical international-law account of statehood (The Creation of States in International Law, OUP 2006).
Refuses
To equate recognition with entitlement; he separates the two.
Used on
/case/framing/glossary · /case/contested-sovereignty
Answers
Why there is no customary international-law crime of terrorism (Defining Terrorism in International Law, OUP 2006).
Refuses
To pretend the political contestation over the term can be resolved by judicial fiat.
Used on
/case/framing/defining-terrorism
Answers
The rebuttal of the STL Ayyash holding on customary terrorism definition (Leiden JIL, 2011).
Refuses
To accept Cassese's STL formulation as binding on the rest of international law.
Used on
/case/framing/defining-terrorism
Answers
The Remedial Right Only (RRO) philosophical theory of secession (Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination, OUP 2004).
Refuses
Plebiscitary or nationalist theories of secession; he rejects both.
Used on
/case/framing/remedial-self-determination
Answers
Why Kosovo is sui generis and the precedent does not generalise (Brill 2008 and subsequent).
Refuses
To treat Kosovo AO 2010 as having affirmed a general right of remedial secession.
Used on
/case/framing/remedial-self-determination
Answers
How the international system should treat de facto states (Polity, 2012).
Refuses
To equate effective governance with governance to international human-rights standards.
Used on
/case/framing/contested-sovereignty
Answers
The four-element working definition of a de facto state (Routledge, 1998).
Refuses
To convert descriptive criteria into a recognition entitlement.
Used on
/case/framing/contested-sovereignty

Jelena Pejic (ICRC)

tlte-cite:icrc-pejic-ct-ihl
Answers
Why IHL and counter-terrorism are distinct legal regimes that should not be conflated.
Refuses
To exempt any party from IHL on the grounds of the other party's CT designation.
Used on
/case/framing/defining-terrorism · /case/framing/contested-sovereignty
Sri Lankan and South Asia scholarship
Answers
The constitutional-history account of the Sri Lankan Tamil federalist tradition (The Break-up of Sri Lanka, 1988).
Refuses
Mono-causal narratives of conflict origin; his account is structural.
Used on
/case/labelling · /case/framing/contested-sovereignty · /case/foundation

Stanley J. Tambiah

tlte-cite:tambiah-1986
Answers
The ethnographic and political-sociological account (Sri Lanka: Ethnic Fratricide, 1986).
Refuses
Reductive ethnicity-as-cause framings; he treats ethnicity as politically mobilised.
Used on
/case/labelling
Answers
The comparative-secession reading (Contested Lands, 2007), including the Bangladesh 1971 comparator.
Refuses
To equate the Eelam and Bangladesh cases; he handles the comparator carefully.
Used on
/case/labelling

Neil DeVotta

Answers
The structural-majoritarianism reading (Blowback, 2004; subsequent work).
Refuses
Symmetric-grievance framings; his account is asymmetric.
Used on
/case/framing/contested-sovereignty · /case/foundation

Nira Wickramasinghe

Answers
The longue-durée political-history account (Sri Lanka in the Modern Age, multiple editions).
Refuses
Single-frame readings; she treats multiple structural histories.
Used on
/case/foundation · /case/civic-repair

International Crisis Group · Sri Lanka file

tlte-cite:icg-srilanka
Answers
Tier-A monitoring of the conflict and post-conflict period (2009–present).
Refuses
Verdicts; ICG is positioned as analysis, not adjudication.
Used on
/case/labelling · /case/post-2009-ledger · /unmai/
What this ledger is not
  • · Not exhaustive. The case file cites scholars not listed here; this is the framing-relevant subset.
  • · Not a curriculum. TLTE does not certify any of these readings.
  • · Not an endorsement of every position. Each entry records what we use the scholar for; we cite their refusals too.
Continue in The Self-Determination Case