Defining Terrorism in International Law

Ben Saul · Oxford University Press (2006); 2nd edn. 2019

tlte-cite:saul-terrorism-oup-2006

Editorial gloss

The standard treatise. Saul's position is that there is no customary international-law crime of terrorism: domestic-statute fragmentation, treaty-consensus absence, and political contestation over national-liberation contexts all weigh against the existence of a customary rule. The doctrinal anchor for the rebuttal of STL Ayyash.

Live source

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/defining-terrorism-in-international-law-9780199295975

Archive snapshot · web.archive.org

Closest capture (auto-resolved)

Snapshot now · Save Page Now

If the live source ever rots, capture a fresh copy on web.archive.org. One click — no account needed.

Dossier tags

case framing
case framing defining terrorism

Citation IDs in the tlte-cite: namespace are append-only and permanent. They can be quoted from any dossier, the Velicham assistant, or external scholarship. The canonical resolver lives atdocs.tlte.cloud/cite/<slug>.

Continue in Reference & Tools

Citations Appendix

Sourced references for the campaign archive.

Primary Evidence Ledger

First-hand documentation underpinning the case.

Comparative Precedents

How other post-conflict societies handled demilitarisation.

Diaspora Law Index· சட்ட அட்டவணை

109 laws, treaties and frameworks across 14 jurisdictions — filter by status, effect on the diaspora, and use-case (asset recovery, accountability, protest rights, self-determination, more). Citation-only.