Eelam Civic R&D Land Hub — standards proposal under HRC Res. 57/1
ஈழ குடிமை ஆராய்ச்சி நில மையம் · தர முன்மொழிவு
A UK-jurisdiction standards document published as a Land Hub: legitimacy stack of named UN instruments, four design-study units, UK CIO + CIC Phase-0 prototype, comparative precedents, public risk register, published refusals. Operational deployment sealed in Vault RB-12. Referral-only forensics. No homeland operations during Aarambam.
- · UK MPs
- · Lords
- · FCDO
- · Charity Commission
- · Office of the Regulator of CICs
- · APPG for Tamils
- · UNESCO National Commission UK
- · Written questions on UK alignment with HRC Resolution 57/1 evidence-preservation paragraphs
- · Written questions on UK support for civil-society standards documents under the Right to Truth
- · Letters to FCDO on UNESCO Memory of the World pathway carriage by qualifying institutions
- · APPG roundtables on diaspora-led civilian standards architecture
The Land Hub is a standards document, not a service. It is referral-only on forensics, intake-free on survivors, and homeland-operations-free during Aarambam. Every refusal cites the instrument that demands it. Every operational detail is sealed in Vault RB-12 under Archon authorisation. UK Lobbying Act 2014 transparency note applies on every printed brief.
Cited Tier-A evidence is open and unresolved. UK is a co-sponsor of UN HRC accountability resolutions but implementation is uneven. Statements honour memory; evidence remains under-actioned.
Statements are backed by structured packs. Each anniversary produces tabled PQs, FCDO follow-ups, and a tracked answer. Memory becomes evidence; evidence becomes policy; policy becomes repair.
Evidence anchors
Each anchor carries a stable E-id for citation in correspondence, PQs, and parliamentary submissions.
- E.land-hub-standards.001Land Hub · spine (TLTE)
- E.land-hub-standards.002Land Hub · doctrine — 12 hard rules (TLTE)
- E.land-hub-standards.003Land Hub · legitimacy stack (TLTE)
- E.land-hub-standards.004Land Hub · public risk register (TLTE)
- E.land-hub-standards.005Land Hub · published refusals (TLTE)
- E.land-hub-standards.006HRC Res. 57/1 — Sri Lanka
- E.land-hub-standards.007UNDRIP — UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
- E.land-hub-standards.008Right to the Truth — OHCHR
- E.land-hub-standards.009Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016)
- E.land-hub-standards.010Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations (2022)
- E.land-hub-standards.011ISO/IEC 17025
- E.land-hub-standards.012UNESCO Memory of the World
- E.land-hub-standards.013ICMP — International Commission on Missing Persons
Policy asks
- UK Government (FCDO)State HM Government's position on the operative paragraphs of HRC Resolution 57/1 that solicit civil-society documentation for evidence preservation on Sri Lanka, and on the role of UK-registered civil-society standards documents in supporting that work.
- UK Government (DCMS)Reaffirm UK alignment with the principles of the UNESCO Memory of the World Programme and identify UK institutions qualified to carry nominations of Tamil documentary heritage prepared to MoW standard.
- UK Government (Home Office, policy)Recognise that referral-only standards documents in UK CIC / CIO vehicles do not require operational counter-terrorism scrutiny when their public posture meets the Civic Protection Doctrine guardrails.
- APPG for TamilsConvene a standing roundtable on diaspora-led civilian standards architecture under HRC 57/1 and the Right to Truth.
Sample Parliamentary Questions
- written→ FCDO
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what HM Government's position is on the operative paragraphs of Human Rights Council Resolution 57/1 that solicit civil-society documentation for evidence preservation on Sri Lanka.
- written→ FCDO
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment has been made of the role of UK-registered civil-society standards documents — including those held in UK Community Interest Companies and Charitable Incorporated Organisations — in supporting evidence preservation under the OHCHR Sri Lanka Accountability Project.
- written→ DCMS
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, which UK institutions are qualified to carry nominations to the UNESCO Memory of the World Programme prepared by diaspora civil-society documentation centres.
- written→ Home Office
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what guidance the Department applies to referral-only standards documents held in UK CIC or CIO vehicles that route inbound queries to accredited international partners such as the International Commission on Missing Persons.
- written→ FCDO
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what HM Government's position is on the application of the Minnesota Protocol, the Berkeley Protocol, and ISO/IEC 17025 to civilian documentation work touching the post-2009 Sri Lankan accountability file.
Pack-specific safety rules
- · Never frames the Land Hub as a forensic, operational, intake, or judicial body.
- · Never names individual trustees, donors, partners under MoU negotiation, or potential homeland sites.
- · Never proposes any UK Government endorsement of TLTE — proposes only HMG positions on the underlying UN instruments and standards.
- · Always pairs every refusal with the UN instrument that demands it (see /land-hub/refusals).
- · Always reads forensic and standards references via accredited partners (ICMP, ITJP, OHCHR Special Procedures, ICRC) — never via TLTE.
- · Lobbying Act 2014 transparency note on every printed brief.
TLTE is not a registered consultant lobbyist. This pack is a public-interest civic document. We do not coordinate statements with MPs and we receive no payment from any government.