TLTE — Transformative League of Tamil Eelam logo
VinMin · வின்மின்·A digital homeland
Institute·Chemmani·Peoples' Tribunal spec
Chemmani · Peoples' Tribunal spec· active
Back to Chemmani case file
Architectural spec · Aarambam era

செம்மணி மக்கள் தீர்ப்பாயம் · வரைவுChemmani Peoples' Tribunal · spec

A Peoples' Tribunal produces a legally-reasoned judgment without state backing — a citable civic artefact for parliamentarians, MEPs, universal-jurisdiction prosecutors, and international observers. The Uyghur Tribunal (Nice KC, Dec 2021) is the working precedent. This page is the form, not the convening.

Form · Peoples' Tribunal, not government-in-exile

A civil-society-convened tribunal producing a legally-reasoned judgment without state backing. TLTE's comparative advantage as a stateless archive is the tribunal form — not sovereign representation. Precedent: Uyghur Tribunal (London, 2020–2021), Sir Geoffrey Nice KC presiding, judgment 9 Dec 2021.

Panel · credentialed jurists, independent of TLTE

The panel is composed of recognised jurists with international criminal law and forensic-standards experience. TLTE does not sit on the panel. TLTE does not select findings. The archive supplies the evidence layer only; the panel adjudicates.

Evidence rules · Tier-A only

Submitted evidence is Tier-A: OHCHR/OSLAP, UN Special Procedures, HRCSL, ITJP, PEARL, Adayaalam, credentialed forensic archaeology (ICMP-standard where applicable), and on-the-record court materials. No survivor names, no TLTE-aggregated counts, no HUMINT, no operational-security material.

Output · citable judgment for third-country use

Written judgment published in full, timed for maximum overlap with active EU GSP+ review cycles and UK APPG on Tamils sitting weeks. Judgment is designed to be quotable in Hansard under parliamentary privilege, cited in MEP resolutions, and referenced in prosecutorial Requests for Assistance under universal jurisdiction.

Guardrails · what a Peoples' Tribunal is not

Not a state court. Not enforceable. Not a substitute for the Jaffna Magistrate's Court process, OSLAP, or ICC Article 15 communications. Not a mechanism to name individual perpetrators for the 2025–26 excavation. A tribunal is a civic instrument; its power is precisely its independence from the state whose conduct it audits.

Now · Aarambam

An architectural spec, not a convening. Panel selection, evidence rules, and judgment format published in advance so any qualified body may adopt or adapt the form.

Becoming · Nilaiththanmai

A future in which every mass-grave case with a live accountability gap has a citable civic judgment on the record, produced by qualified jurists on standardised evidence rules.

Sources
  • The Uyghur Tribunal9 December 2021
    Judgment (Sir Geoffrey Nice KC, chair) · 9 December 2021
    Open source
  • Uyghur TribunalStanding
    Institutional overview
    Open source
  • OHCHRStanding (HRC 46/1 → 60/1)
    Sri Lanka Accountability Project — evidence-preservation mandate
    Open source
Institutional disclosure

An institutional surface of TLTE. Operated through the Unmai (live intelligence), Remembrance (memory) and Pattarai (workshop) organs. TLTE has seven canonical organs; the Institute is how they speak together on accountability. It is not an eighth organ, not a court, not a forensic body, not a survivor service.

The Institute mirrors, organises, and amplifies the work of named accountability bodies. It does not replace OHCHR, ITJP, PEARL, Adayaalam, the Office on Missing Persons, the Bishop of Mannar's standing call, or the courts of Sri Lanka.

Continue in Unmai · Live Intelligence