Demilitarisation of the North-East
வடக்கு-கிழக்கு படை விலக்கம்
The post-2009 military footprint, occupied land, and the case for sequenced, monitored demilitarisation. Pairs with Petition-01.
Audience & use
Audience: UK MPs · FCDO · Defence Committee · International Development Committee
Best used for: Adjournment debates on Sri Lanka · FCDO PQs on military footprint and land return · Letters supporting OHCHR Accountability Project mandate renewal · Briefings on civilian safety in the Northern and Eastern Provinces
Remembrance frame
Demilitarisation is not anti-military — it is pro-civilian. The ask is sequenced reduction, civilian oversight, and land return, not the removal of a national army.
Two-layer reading
Cited Tier-A evidence is open and unresolved. Statements honour memory; evidence remains under-actioned.
Each anniversary produces tabled PQs, FCDO follow-ups, and a tracked answer.
Evidence anchors (Tier-A)
Policy asks
Sample Parliamentary Questions
- written → FCDO
What recent representations has the Government made to Sri Lanka on demilitarisation of the Northern and Eastern Provinces? - written → FCDO
What assessment has the Government made of the pace of military land return to private owners in the Northern Province? - oral → FCDO
Will the Government support continued OHCHR reporting on military presence and land occupation in Sri Lanka?
Pack-specific safety rules
- Never name serving police or military personnel. Never publish base coordinates beyond what UN reports already disclose.
- Always frame this as multi-community: Tamil, Eastern Muslim, Up-country Tamil, and multi-faith clergy share the civilian safety interest.
- Pair every UK FCDO ask with a Tier-A UN or OHCHR citation.