Six institutions the Hub reads carefully. For each: what we adopt into our design, and what we refuse to imitate.
Standards-publication discipline. Continuity through institutional design rather than charismatic leadership. Multi-decade horizon.
Government-in-exile framing. State-equivalent claims. Symbolic ministries TLTE would not staff or fund.
Witness-protection-by-architecture. Multi-jurisdictional trustee model. Document chain-of-custody as a default operating posture.
Prosecutorial function. Closed-list witness handling. Anything requiring a TLTE warrant.
Accreditation discipline (ISO/IEC 17025). Family-engagement standards. Multi-conflict applicability — the standard partner the Hub refers to.
Becoming an ICMP analogue under TLTE. The Hub does not run a DNA lab.
Generational documentation discipline. Pedagogy of memory. Refusal to let evidence drift into rhetoric.
State-anchored framing. National-myth alignment. Pedagogical authority TLTE cannot legitimately claim.
Site-of-conscience methodology. UNESCO Memory of the World inscription pathway. Survivor-led narrative governance.
Mass display of identifying photographs without consent frameworks current standards now require.
Civil-society-led documentation feeding an international tribunal (ECCC). Long horizon. Cite-and-route discipline.
Acting as a court annexe. Producing prosecutable case files. Anything requiring an indictment chain.